Q11. Case Study

With the summer heat being exceptionally severe this year, the district has been facing severe water shortage. The District Collector has been mobilizing his subordinate officials to conserve the remaining water reserves to prevent the district from plunging into an acute drinking water crisis. Along with an awareness campaign for conserving water, strict measures have been taken for stopping the over-exploitation of ground-water. Vigilance teams have been deployed to tour the villages and find the farmers who are drawing water from deep borewells or from the river reservoir for irrigation.The farmers are agitated by such action. A delegation of farmers meets the District Collector with their issues and complains that while they are not being allowed to irrigate their crops, big industries located near the river are drawing huge amounts of water through deep borewells for their industrial processes. The farmers allege that their administration is anti-farmer and corrupt, being bribed by the industry. The district needs to placate the farmers as they are threatening to go on a prolonged protest. At the same time, the District Collector has to deal with the water crisis. The industry cannot be closed as this would result in a large number of workers being unemployed.

  1. Discuss all options available to the District Collector as a District Magistrate.
  2. What suitable actions can be taken in view of mutually compatible interests of the stakeholders?
  3. What are the potential administrative and ethical dilemmas for the District Collector? (Answer in 250 words)

Introduction

In the above case study, The District Collector (DC) faces a challenging situation, balancing between the need to manage a water crisis, address farmers' concerns, and avoid shutting down industries. A careful approach that considers both short-term relief and long-term water management is needed. 

Body

Stakeholders Involved:

  1. District Collector and Concerned authorities
  2. People of the District
  3. Farmers
  4. Industries

The District Collector faces several administrative and ethical dilemmas in managing this situation:

Administrative Dilemmas:

  • Public Unrest: Farmers threaten protests, which could escalate into social and economic instability, especially in a rural district dependent on agriculture.
  • Economic Consequences: Closing industries could lead to unemployment, further compounding the crisis. 
  • Enforcement of Restrictions: Ensuring that water conservation laws are enforced uniformly across sectors.
  • Monitoring Corruption: Allegations of corruption must be addressed, requiring a transparent process that ensures fairness while maintaining the morale of officials.

Ethical Dilemmas:

  • Fairness and Equity: The District Collector must ensure that water distribution is fair, and that no group feels unjustly treated or discriminated against.
  • Sustainability vs. Livelihoods: Weighing the long-term sustainability of water resources against the immediate need for livelihoods.
  • Trust and Transparency: The administration must act transparently to regain the trust of the farmers and avoid perceptions of favoritism toward industries.
  • Environmental Responsibility: Balancing economic activities with environmental conservation and preventing long-term damage due to over-extraction of water resources.

Navigating these dilemmas requires the District Collector to prioritize equitable solutions, maintain social stability, and ensure transparency and accountability in the administration’s actions.

Below are the various options available to the District Collector:

1. Option 1 - Enforcing Equal Restrictions on Water Use for Both Farmers and Industries

Merits

Demerits

Fairness and Public Trust

Restricting industries could lead to economic consequences

Resource Conservation

Immediate restrictions could cause unrest among workers dependent on industries for their livelihoods.

2. Option 2 - Implementing a Tiered Water Allocation System

Merits

Demerits

Balanced approach keeping all needs in mind

Complex to Administer and could lead to inadequacy

Allows Flexibility and reduces conflict

May lead to Farmer Dissatisfaction

3. Option 3 - Negotiating with Farmers for Temporary Compromises

Merits

Demerits

Creating Long Term Partnerships

Might lead to delay in action

Dialogue Based Approach and Avoid Crisis

It is a temporary relief measure and might create mistrust in long run

4. Option 4 - Mandating Water Recycling and Efficiency Measures for Industries

Merits

Demerits

Will ensure economic continuity and sustainability

High initial Investment

Eco-friendly initiative that can be supported by industries and garner public goodwill

It might not bring immediate relief

Here’s a set of actions that could help address the issue:

  • Equitable Water Management: by rationing of Water Usage while prioritizing drinking water. 
  • Transparent Allocation of water: A Water Allocation Committee can be formed with representation from all stakeholders involved, which should take data driven decisions based on real time analysis. 
  • Alternate Water Sources and Efficiency Improvements: by promoting Water-Saving Technology  such as drip irrigation and sprinklers. Industries to recycle water and also invest in rainwater harvesting. 
  • Enforce Regulations Fairly: by stricter Monitoring of All Users and taking anti-corruption measures. 
  • Crisis Support for Farmers: by providing compensation for crop losses and parallelly encouraging less water intensive crops. 
  • Public Awareness Campaigns: Continue the campaign for water conservation, but broaden it to target both farmers and industries, emphasizing the long-term benefits of sustainable water use for the entire district.

The District Collector needs a multipronged approach that balances immediate crisis management with long-term sustainability. A combination of tiered water allocation, strict water-use restrictions on industries, and dialogue with farmers is likely to yield the best short-term results. Simultaneously, the District Collector can seek State and Central Government’s assistance in promoting rainwater harvesting, micro-irrigation, crop diversification and drought resistance crops that will help create a more sustainable water management system for the future. 

Conclusion

By taking these actions, we can foster an environment of collaboration, ensure fair water distribution, and prevent the district from descending into conflict or economic instability. Communication, transparency, and engaging with all stakeholders (farmers, industries, and government) are essential to avoid escalation into protests and economic losses while addressing the critical water crisis.

Instant Mains Evaluation with SuperKalam

✅ Now that you have gone through the model answer, try practicing and writing it in your own words and evaluate it instantly with SuperKalam here - Evaluate Mains Answer instantly

Download Model Answer PDF for complete UPSC Mains 2024 GS4 Paper with analysis here - Download GS4 Model Answers