Immanuel Kant's quote highlights the distinction between legal guilt and ethical guilt, emphasizing the importance of moral intent in ethical behavior. This reflects the significance of upholding ethical principles not just in actions but also in intentions, which is crucial for personal integrity and public accountability in governance.

Q. 3(c) In law, a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics, he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so." - Immanuel Kant

Model Answer:

Introduction

Immanuel Kant's quote emphasizes the fundamental difference between law and ethics. While the law requires tangible evidence of a violation to hold someone accountable, ethics concerns not just actions but also thoughts and intentions. This reflects the deeper moral responsibility humans hold within themselves, beyond the external consequences that the law can enforce.

Body

Key points in the present context:

Legal Guilt; In the legal context, guilt is established through actions that infringe upon the rights of others. For instance, theft, assault, or fraud are clear violations of legal rights, and the perpetrator is held accountable through judicial processes. Legal systems are designed to maintain social order by penalizing actions that harm individuals or society. some text
- For example, the Indian Penal Code (IPC) outlines specific offenses and corresponding punishments to deter and address rights violations.
Ethical Guilt: As per Kant, involves the concept of "Moral Inhibition," where the mere intention or thought of committing a wrongful act is considered morally culpable. Kantian ethics emphasizes the importance of duty and the categorical imperative, which dictates that one should act only according to maxims that can be universally applied. some text
- For instance, even contemplating dishonesty or harm towards others violates one's moral duty, reflecting a breach of ethical standards. This internal moral compass is crucial for self-regulation and integrity.
Corruption: While corruption is only illegal when proven with evidence, ethically, the mere intent to engage in corrupt practices is equally wrong.
Social Biases: Legal frameworks may not address subtle biases or stereotypes, but ethically, having such thoughts about people based on race, gender, or religion is a moral violation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Kant’s quote encourages us to reflect on our inner thoughts and intentions, advocating for a higher ethical standard that goes beyond the limits of the law. True morality is measured not just by what we do, but also by what we think.

‍

Instant Mains Evaluation with SuperKalam

✅ Now that you have gone through the model answer, try practicing and writing it in your own words and evaluate it instantly with SuperKalam here - Evaluate Mains Answer instantly

‍

✅ Download Model Answer PDF for complete UPSC Mains 2024 GS4 Paper with analysis here - Download GS4 Model Answers

‍

UPSC 2024 Mains GS4 Model Answer - In law, a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics, he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so." - Immanuel Kant

Table of contents

Q. 3(c) In law, a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics, he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so." - Immanuel Kant

Introduction

Body

Conclusion

Instant Mains Evaluation with SuperKalam

Recent articles

UPSC 2024 Mains GS2 Model Answer - What changes has the union government recently introduced in the domain of center- state relations ? Suggest measures to be adopted to build the trust between the center and the states and for strengthening federalism.

Right to privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty and is inherently protected under Article 21 of the constitution. Explain. In this reference discuss the law relating to D.N.A. testing of a child in the womb to establish its paternity.